https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cya.2017.03.001
Paper Research
Influence
of information systems in organizational performance
Influencia de los sistemas de información en los
resultados organizacionales
Demian Abrego Almazán 1
Yesenia Sánchez Tovar1
José M. Medina Quintero1
1 Universidad
Autónoma de Tamaulipas, México
Corresponding author: D. Abrego Almazán, email: dabrego@uat.edu.mx
Abstract:
Over the last years, information
systems (IS) have constituted the main focus of research in the business
organization literature. This has created the need to identify their
entrepreneurial value. The paper presents a theory-based model that was
developed to assess the degree of IS success in SMEs. The aim of the proposed
model is to determine the influence of IS on organizational performance. To
achieve this aim, the Partial Least Square statistical technique is used to
analyze data from 133 questionnaires administered to businesses across the
state of Tamaulipas, Mexico. The results show that those enterprises that are
more concerned with the improvement of the systems’ quality, information
quality and the informatics service enhance the organizational outcomes. The
present study contributes to the body of literature on the assessment of IS
success in the context of an emerging country. In particular, the study
provides a thorough assessment of the IS effectiveness and their impact on
organizational performance.
Keywords: Information systems success, Partial Least Squares,
Organizational outcomes.
JEL classification: M15.
Resumen:
Durante los últimos años los sistemas de información (SI)
han constituido uno de los principales ámbitos de estudio en el área de
organización de empresas, ocasionado por la necesidad de identificar su valor
empresarial, por lo que en esta investigación, y en base a una revisión
teórica, se desarrolla un modelo de evaluación del éxito de los SI para las
pequeñas y medianas empresas (Pymes) con el objetivo de determinar la
influencia de los SI en los resultados organizacionales. Para alcanzar la meta,
se empleó la técnica estadística de mínimos cuadrados parciales ( partial least squares
, [PLS]), mediante la aplicación de un cuestionario a 133 empresas del estado
de Tamaulipas, México. Los resultados obtenidos permiten deducir que las
empresas que se preocupan más por mejorar la calidad del sistema, la calidad de
la información y la del servicio informático favorecen sus resultados
organizacionales. El presente trabajo contribuye a la literatura sobre la
medición del éxito de los SI en el contexto de un país con una economía
emergente, en forma particular al permitir identificar de manera más amplia la
medición de su efectividad y su incidencia en el rendimiento empresarial.
Palabras-clave: Éxito de los sistemas de información, Mínimos
cuadrados parciales, Resultados organizacionales.
Códigos JEL: M15.
Received: 17/03/2015
Accepted: 09/02/2016
Introduction
Information systems are one
of the most relevant components of the current business environment. They offer
great opportunities for success for the companies; given that they have the
capability of collecting, processing, distributing, and sharing data in an
integrated and timely manner. Furthermore, they help narrow geographical gaps,
allowing employees to be more efficient, which is reflected in an improvement
of the processes, administration, and the management of information, thus
resulting in a positive impact on the productivity and competitiveness of the
companies ( Bakos & Treacy, 1986; Rai, Patnayakuni,
& Seth, 2006; Ynzunza & Izar,
2011 ).
However,
these advantages make the organizations more dependable on the IS to carry out
their day to day activities ( Gómez
& Suárez, 2012 ), which forces them to invest more in this type of
technologies ( Petter, DeLone,
& McLean, 2008 ). Nevertheless, the concerns regarding the economic
scenarios and the growing global competency create pressures to reduce them ( Derksen & Luftman, 2013; Petter et al.,
2008 ). Therefore, organizations require measuring and examining the costs
and benefits of this type of technology to better know the profitability of the
investments made, given that these are expected to generate positive returns
for the institution ( Gable, Sedera, & Chan, 2008; Ravichandran
& Lertwongsatien, 2005 ).
This
investigation has the objective of determining the influence of the success of
the IS on the organizational results (OR). For a company, the OR allow
measuring its operational efficiency ( Sedera & Gable, 2004 ). In this scope, the
model developed by DeLone and McLean (1992,
2003) to evaluate the success of the IS has proven to be a useful framework to
deduce its success or effectiveness ( Petter, DeLone, &
McLean, 2013 ) by recognizing that the quality dimensions of the IS are a distinctive
characteristic of the perception of the user in the use of new technologies ( Solano, García, &
Bernal, 2014 ); thus, achieving a positive impact on the individual and
organizational performance ( DeLone & McLean, 2003).
Therefore,
an empirical study has been carried out with 133 SMEs from the state of
Tamaulipas, Mexico, to statistically infer some aspects related to this type of
organizations. From this aspect, the contribution of this work is considered
relevant, as it broadens the framework of empirical studies related to the IS
success model proposed by DeLone and McLean.
Finally,
this investigation has been divided into five parts: the first comprises a
review of the literature; the second has the proposed model and its
justification; the third presents the description of the method utilized; the
fourth comprises the analysis of the results; and, finally, the fifth section
presents the main conclusions obtained, describing the limitations and future
lines of research.
Review of the literature
Information systems and their success
The IS of a company represents the combination of human and material
means in charge of processing the business information ( Medina, 2005 ), having a relevant role and being the cause of competitive advantages
( Ferreira & Cherobim, 2012 ). Information Systems use computer equipment, databases, software,
procedures, analysis models, and decision-making administrative processes ( Turban, Volonino, &
Wood, 2013 ). Traditionally, ISs
are designed within each functional area to support and increase their efficiency
and operational efficacy ( Haag & Cummings,
2013 ). Information Systems
are characterized by being comprised of smaller systems, capable of functioning
either in an integrated manner or independently. Furthermore, if they are able
to interrelate, they can comprise the IS of the entire organization, therefore,
an IS can be defined as the group of elements focused on processing,
administering, and disseminating data and information, organized and ready for
their subsequent use, generated to cover an organizational need. This is
similar to the ideas posed by Davis
and Olson (1985), Andreu, Ricart, and Valor
(1996) , Haag and Cummings (2013), and Turban et al. (2013).
Since the 1970s, the measurement of the impact
of the success of the IS has been researched with different studies enabling
the accumulation of important knowledge on the topic ( Solano et al., 2014 ). Among the different movements that embrace the importance of the IS,
we can find the one based on the theory of resources and capabilities ( Ravichandran & Lertwongsatien, 2005 ) or the one related to the software industry. The latter is the one in
which different quality management models have been proposed, some focused on
the products and others on the processes ( Pesado et al., 2013 ). This allows an improvement in productivity with regard to software
development ( Díaz & Sligo, 1997 ). Nevertheless, a focus integrated in the context of the Information
Systems is deficient, given that there is less emphasis regarding the quality
improvement of the information and the service ( Gorla, Somers, & Wong, 2010 ).
In this sense, DeLone
and McLean (D&M) have proposed, since 1992, a model that allows measuring
the impact that the IS provide to the organization, and given the acceptance
and critiques it had by the researchers, it was updated in 2003 ( Roldán & Leal, 2003 ). The inclusion of the quality service construct was among the main
changes, being evaluated mainly through SERVQUAL. In this update, the
observation of its main critic—Peter Seddon—which indicated replacing the
individual and organizational impact variables for the net benefits variable
was also addressed ( DeLone & McLean, 2003).
According to Ballantine
et al. (1996), Seddon (1997), and Wu and Wang (2006) , the model by DeLone and Mc Lean makes several
significant contributions to the understanding of the success of the IS.
Firstly, it provides a diagram to classify the different measurements of
success that have been proposed in the literature. Secondly, it suggests
temporary and causal interdependencies between the identified categories; and
thirdly, it provides an appropriate base for further empirical and theoretical
research. Because of this, it has a general acceptance in the IS community, in
part due to its intelligibility and simplicity ( Urbach, Smolnik,
& Riempp, 2009 ), as this model is one of the most referenced in the literature of
Information Systems ( Gable et al., 2008;
Gorla et al., 2010; Heo & Han, 2003; McGill &
Hobbs 2003; Medina & Chaparro, 2007; Petter et al., 2008, 2013; Urbach
et al., 2009 ).
Regarding its interrelations, the model proposes
that the quality dimensions (of the system, information, and service) of an IS
affect both the use–utility of the system as well as the satisfaction of the
user. It proposes that the latter in turn can be affected reciprocally, in
addition to being direct antecedents of the net benefits. This allows it to be
applied to any level of analysis that the researcher considers most relevant ( Gorla et al., 2010; Igbaria
& Tan, 1997; Petter et al., 2008; Roldán & Leal, 2003; Seddon & Kiew,
1994 ). Therefore, this model
is characterized for trying to find more consistent and appropriate
measurements for an adequate evaluation of the IS ( Solano et al., 2014).
Organizational
impact
Currently, the companies are obligated to
be connected to each other and to other organizations, as a consequence of
fusions, reduction in the costs of operation, and market strategies, among
others. Therefore, the need for investment on Information Systems is an non-debatable fact, but its high cost entails the
interest of the company in having a successful implementation and integration
with the institutional objectives. However, empirical evidence points out that
the sole investment in IS and in new management tools does not guarantee the
improvement of the business results ( Lee,
2012; Pérez & Machado, 2015 ). And this drives the academia to delve
further in the knowledge of the explicative factors of the success of the IS
and their impacts on the companies.
The explanation of the effects generated
by the IS in the organizations have led researches to propose evaluation instruments
that consider organizational strategy and competitiveness advantage as impact
variables ( Bradley, Pridmore, &
Byrd, 2006; Gable et al., 2008; Mahmood & Soon, 1991; Sethi
& King, 1994; Tallon, Kraemer, & Gurbaxani, 2000 ). Whereas others try to evaluate this
relationship based on the theory of resources and capabilities, in which the
performance of an organization can be explained by the efficiency of the
business when it makes use of information technology ( Ravichandran & Lertwongsatien,
2005 ).
However, regardless of the focus, the search for organizational benefits or
positive effects becomes the objective of the businesses as a key element for
the decision to invest in IS.
The aforementioned forces researchers to
define conclusive measurements for the desired organizational result, with
examples such as economic profitability, net value, utility and growth,
marketing achievements, improvement on productivity, internal efficiency, innovation,
improvement in the quality of the products, cost reduction, better relationship
with providers, decision making … among others; detecting in their results the
existence of significant relationships between the dimensions of success of an
IS and the perceived benefits ( Bradley
et al., 2006; Gonzáles, 2012; Gorla et al., 2010; Haberkamp, Maçada, Raimundini, & Bianchi, 2010; Lunardi,
Dolci, & Maçada, 2010;
Pérez & Machado, 2015; Rai et al., 2006; Sedera
& Gable, 2004; Solano et al., 2014; Tona, Carlsson, & Eom, 2012 ).
These research works have demonstrated
that the organizational impact construct can refer to the degree in which the
IS have promoted improvements at the organizational level, that is,
improvements in their organizational results. Nevertheless, this construct has
proven to be problematic in business research ( Ynzunza & Izar,
2011 )
and, given that there is no recognized universal measurement for this concept,
it can be evaluated with objective and subjective data ( Croteau & Bergeron, 2001 ), where the objective approach refers to
the numerical data of a financial nature provided by the organization, whereas
the subjective measures focus on capturing the perception of the businesses.
Fig. 1:
Conceptual model and hypothesis.
Without a doubt, IS are a vital
technological tool for any institution in this period of globalization, where
the efficient administration of data and information brings with it a
competitive business advantage.
Research model and
hypothesis
The conceptual model utilized to guide
this study is shown in Fig. 1 , and is based on the model proposed in 2003
by D&M. The model explains that the quality of the system, of the
information, and of the service affect both the use–utility of the system as
well as the user satisfaction. However, it is important to mention that it has
been proposed that the service quality variable should not be considered a
determining measurement of success, given that said construct establishes
success instead of being a part of it ( Tona et al., 2012; Wu & Wang, 2006 ). In this study, however, it is
considered a relevant factor to be evaluated, as consequence of the growing
demand for external providers of Information Technology (IT) for the
development and support of systems, especially in businesses that due to their
size, economic issues, or business strategies, do not have sufficient human and
technological resources allocated for such purposes.
Conceptual
model |
Hypotheses |
Additional supporting references
|
The quality of the system, the quality of the
information, and the quality of the service of an IS, individually and
collectively affect both the use–utility of the IS as well as the user
satisfaction. |
H1: The quality of the information is positively
associated to user satisfaction. |
Wixom
and Watson (2001), Rai, Lang, and Walker (2002) , Shin
(2003), McGill
and Hobbs (2003), Roldán and Leal (2003), Wixom
and Todd (2005), Halawi, McCarthy, and
Aronson (2007) , Pérez (2010), Nunes (2012). |
H2: The quality of the information is positively
associated to the use–utility of the system. |
Rai
et al. (2002), Roldán and Leal (2003), McGill
and Hobbs (2003), Fitzgerald and Russo (2005), Pérez
(2010). |
|
H3: The quality of the system is positively
associated to user satisfaction. |
Choe (1996), Chen, Soliman, Mao, and Frolick
(2000) , Hwang, Windsor, and Pryor (2000) , McGill
and Hobbs (2003), Roldán and Leal (2003), Halawi et al. (2007), Kim, Moon, and Kim (2012) , Nunes (2012). |
|
H4: The quality of the system is positively
associated to the use–utility of the system. |
Hwang
et al. (2000), Caldeira and Ward (2002), McGill
and Hobbs (2003), Roldán and Leal (2003), Fitzgerald
and Russo (2005), Pérez (2010).
|
|
H5: The quality of the service is positively
associated to user satisfaction. |
Pitt,
Watson, and Kavan (1995) , Halawi et al. (2007), Bharati and Berg (2005), Bharati and Chaudhury
(2006), Kettinger et al. (2009), Kim
et al. (2012), Nunes (2012). |
|
H6: The quality of the service is positively
associated to the use–utility of the system. |
Pitt
et al. (1995), Caldeira and Ward (2002), Fitzgerald
and Russo (2005), Wu and Wang (2006), Pérez
(2010). |
|
The degree of user satisfaction can affect the
use–utility of the IS. |
H8: User satisfaction is positively associated to
the use–utility of the system. |
Baroudi, Olson, and Ives (1986) , Torkzadeh and Dwyer (1994), McGill
and Hobbs (2003), Roldán and Leal (2003), Livari (2005), Bokhari, 2005; Wu and Wang (2006) , Qutaishat, Khattab,
Zaid, and Al-Manasra (2012) , Nunes (2012). |
The Use of the IS and user satisfaction are direct
precedents of the Organizational Results. |
H7: User satisfaction and Organizational Results are
interrelated. |
McGill,
Hobbs, and Klobas (2000) , McGill
and Hobbs (2003), Roldán and Leal (2003), Wu
and Wang (2006), Pérez (2010), Nunes (2012). |
H9: The use–utility of the system and Organizational
Results are interrelated. |
McGill
and Hobbs (2003), Roldán and Leal (2003), Wu
and Wang (2006), Law and Ngai (2007), Pérez
(2010). |
As
can be observed in Fig. 1 , the hypotheses to be
tested are also represented, summarized in Table
1
, where the theoretical support provided by the DeLone and McLean model (1992, 2003) can also be observed. An
additional relation of references of studies on IS that support them is
annexed.
Method
To analyze the success of the IS in companies of the private sector in Tamaulipas state, a prior review of the specialized literature was carried out in order to: (i) approximate to the problematic detected with regard to the success of the IS in the organizations in the area of study; (ii) know the theoretical model of DeLone and McLean more in depth; (iii) justify and contend the work hypotheses; and (iv) define, determine, and adjust the indicators and factors of the proposed constructs. Below, we present its operational definition.
·
Information quality, defined in this work as complete, timely, useful,
relevant, with good appearance and format (adequate design) that is easy to
understand and interpret ( Ballou & Tayi, 1999; DeLone & McLean,
1992, 2003; Gorla et al., 2010; Medina, Lavín, &
Pedraza, 2011; Nelson, Todd, & Wixom, 2005; Petter
et al., 2008; Tona et al., 2012; Wixom & Watson,
2001 ).
·
System quality, is defined as the IS designed with useful
characteristics, with adequate response times, easy to learn-use, with an
adequate level of integration ( Bradley
et al., 2006; DeLone & McLean, 2003; Gorla et
al., 2010; Sabherwal, Jeyaraj,
& Chowa, 2006; Seddon, 1997; Tona
et al., 2012; Wixom & Watson, 2001 ).
·
Service quality, measured through matters related to the response
capacity, and intended to evaluate the degree of effort of the IT support
personnel to provide the adequate elements and information services to the
users ( Bradley et al., 2006; Carr, 2002; Gorla et al., 2010; Kettinger
& Lee, 1994; Vázquez, 2015 ).
·
User satisfaction, is specified as how the user feels after using the
system (confidence), if they perceive that it has been efficient, effective,
and if it is in agreement with their needs ( Gonzáles, 2012; Medina et al., 2011; Tona et al., 2012; Wu & Wang, 2006 ).
·
Use–utility, is defined as follows: if when using the system, the user
perceives that they carry out their functions faster, that their work
performance improves, and that their productivity increases, then they can make
better decisions; and if they find the system useful for work and not just for
measuring it through general use, average use or the average duration of use ( Gonzáles, 2012; Livari, 2005; Medina & Chaparro,
2007; Seddon, 1997; Taylor & Todd, 1995; Tona et
al., 2012; Wu & Wang, 2006 ).
·
Organizational Results, in this investigation these are considered as an
increase in sales, market quota, productivity, improvement on the processes, in
their capacity of operations management, or in the decrease of operational and
personnel costs ( Gable et al., 2008;
Gorla et al., 2010; Haberkamp et al., 2010; Mahmood
& Soon, 1991; Rai et al., 2006; Sedera &
Gable, 2004; Sethi & King, 1994; Tallon et al., 2000 ).
Regarding the survey, it
was comprised of 46 items, 8 for descriptive data and 38 in a Likert scale of 5
points (1, Strongly disagree – 5, Strongly agree). As for the pilot test, it
was carried out in the central zone of the Mexican state of Tamaulipas, on
April 2014, with a sample size of 65 companies. The internal consistency
results of each of the theoretically proposed variables were evaluated by the
Cronbach's Alpha coefficient, surpassing the recommended minimums for this type
of analysis. It is worth mentioning that the results of this preliminary study
were presented in the IX International Congress of Research in Accounting,
Administration, and Informatics, carried out by the UNAM on October 2014.
The
sample was obtained parting from the records provided by the Mexican Business
Information System ( Sistema de Información Empresarial Mexicano ;
SIEM, http://www.siem.gob.mx
) where, for May 2014, 1528 companies were registered in the state of
Tamaulipas, all complying with the selection criteria stipulated in this
investigation—to have more than 10 employees and to be from the service and
commerce economic sectors. After identifying the participating companies, the
corresponding authorization was processed with the different Chambers and Trade
and Service Associations of the locality for the support in the implementation
of the instrument.
The
field work was carried out through convenience sampling, and the data collection
was done between November 2014 and February 2015, through on-site visits to the
companies, explaining the objective of the study to the key informant (subject
of investigation). In this case, the key informants addressed were the general
and accounting managers, as they comply with the desired profile–having
information on the business processes and IT knowledge ( Ferreira & Cherobim,
2012; Gorla et al., 2010 ). The final sample achieved for this investigation
was of 133 companies belonging to the commerce and service sectors.
Data analysis and results
First of all, the findings regarding the
descriptive data are presented. From the companies that comprised the sample, 16%
correspond to companies situated in the city of Reynosa, 15% to Nuevo Laredo,
19% to Matamoros, 27% to Ciudad Victoria, and 23% to Tampico and its urban
area. Regarding the economic sector to which they belong, 41% are service
companies and the remaining 59% belong to the commerce sector. As for the
number of employees of the companies analyzed, 59% of the companies had an
average of 11–30 employees, 14% had a total of 31–50 employees, whereas 11% had
more than 50 but less than 100 employees, and finally 17% of the companies
corresponded to organizations with an average of 101–250 employees. For its
part, it stands out that 61% of the analyzed companies have been using
technologies for more than 10 years, which allows to infer that companies tend
to use IS to obtain information and to manage their operations.
For the analysis of the data, the modeling
of structural equations based on components/variance was utilized, implementing
the SmartPLS version 3.1.3 informatics pack ( Ringle, Wende, &
Becker, 2014 ). To
validate the measurement model, the following proceedings were carried out: (i) analyze the content validity and the apparent validity;
(ii) calculate the individual reliability of the item through the loading for
the case of reflective constructs; and (iii) examine the construct validity:
convergent and discriminant.
Regarding the validity of the content, a
review was carried out on the literature specialized in the general systems
theory, on the IS evaluation models, and on the impact of the IT services in
the organizations. Similarly, an adaptation of the initially proposed
measurement scales was done. For this purpose, the apparent validity was
verified, which allows to indicate if the measurement scale appears to be
valid, and that it is understood from the point of view of the survey ( Casaló, Flavián, & Guinalíu, 2011 ). The aforementioned allowed performing a
filtering of items by different researchers and experts specialized in the subject
matter, guaranteeing satisfactory results, as suggested by Straub
(1989).
To validate the measurement model, a
series of tests were carried out with the purpose of determining if the survey
had the reliability required. In this sense, the first test focuses on
determining the individual reliability of the indicators, which consists in
accepting an indicator or not as a component of a reflective construct. For
this, the indicators must have a factorial load ( λ ) or simple correlations equal to or
greater than 0.707 ( Carmines & Zeller, 1979 ). This indicates that the variance
shared between the construct and the indicators of the same is greater than the
error variance. Taking as reference the aforementioned acceptance criteria,
eight indicators were eliminated (IQ5, IQ6, SQ2, SQ5, SAT5, UU5, OR6), Table
2
shows the results.
Construct |
(α) |
(ρc) |
AVE
|
Organizational results (OR) |
0.918
|
0.933
|
0.635
|
Information quality (IQ) |
0.860
|
0.905
|
0.706
|
System quality (SQ) |
0.764
|
0.849
|
0.585
|
Service quality (SerQ)
|
0.914
|
0.932
|
0.662
|
User satisfaction (US) |
0.848
|
0.898
|
0.689
|
Use–utility of the system (UU) |
0.883
|
0.919
|
0.740
|
The second test consists on evaluating the
reliability of the construct, which is done through two internal consistency
measurements: Cronbach's Alpha ( α
) and the composite reliability coefficient (ρc), given that the interpretation of both
values is similar. Therefore, the guidelines provided by Hair,
Hult, Ringle, and Sarstedt (2014) are used, which suggest 0.7 as the point
of reference for both Cronbach's Alpha and the composite reliability. Table
3 presents the results
obtained, showing that all the constructs are reliable and, therefore, have a
satisfactory internal consistency.
Another test to determine the reliability
of an instrument in PLS is convergent validity, which is calculated using the Average
Extracted Variance (AVE). The AVE coefficient provides the quantity of variance
that a reflective construct obtains from its indicators with regard to the
quantity of variance due to the measurement error. As can be observed in Table
3 ,
the AVE coefficient for the reflective constructs is greater than 0.5 ( Fornell & Larcker,
1981 ).
This means that more than 50% of the variance of the construct is due to its
indicators. According to these suggestions, all the AVE measurements are valid.
Finally, the discriminant validity must be
evaluated, which consists on proving if the analyzed construct is significantly
removed from other constructs with which it is theoretically related ( Roldán, 2000 ). In this sense, the values of the
correlation matrix between constructs were analyzed; which is comprised by the
square root of the AVE coefficient and must be greater than the rest of its
column ( Chin, 2000; Sánchez & Roldán,
2005 ). As
can be observed in Table 4 , all the indicators comply with the
empirical criteria. Therefore, the discriminant validity of the different constructs
that make up the proposed model is guaranteed.
Once it has been proven that the
measurement model complies with the aforementioned criteria (the measurements
of the constructs are reliable and valid), the relationship level between the
constructs and the prediction capability of the endogenous variables is
analyzed, evaluating the weight and magnitude of the relationships (hypothesis)
between the different variables; for this, the structural model must be
evaluated. This assessment entails the usage of two basic indexes: explained variance (R 2 ),
which indicates the predictive power of the model, and standardized path coefficients (β ), which indicate the strength of the
relationships between the dependent and independent variables ( Johnson,
Herrmann, & Huber, 2006 ).
Regarding the predictive capability of the
model, the R 2 of
the endogenous or dependent variables must be equal to or greater than 0.1 ( Falk
& Miller, 1992 ), given that according to the authors,
lower values provide little information. On the other hand, Chin
(1998)
suggests that this value must be equal to or greater than 0.19. Parting from
this last criterion, the adjusted R 2
values of the researched constructs are within desirable ranges, therefore, all
the constructs hold an acceptable predictive power quality. Table
5
shows the results obtained.
Regarding the analysis of how the
exogenous variables in the dependent constructs contributed to the explained
variance, the values obtained in the path coefficients ( β ) were used, which must have at least a
value of 0.2 to be considered significant ( Chin,
1998 ).
It is worth noting that the non-parametric Bootstrap technique was utilized,
with a resampling procedure with replacement, considering 133 cases with 5000
samples, as recommended for final results ( Hair
et al., 2014 ).
From the aforementioned, Student's t values and the significance (p) were obtained.
For a distribution of the two tailed
Student's t values with n degrees of freedom, with n being the number of samples considered in
the Bootstrap technique, the values that determined the statistical
significance are: t (95%) = 1.965*, t (99%) = 2.586**, and t (99.9%) = 3.310***. As can be observed in Table
6 , of
the total stated hypotheses, only hypothesis H6 was not significant.
Continuing with the statistical inference,
the Stone-Geisser procedure or Q 2 parameter
(Cross Validated Redundancy) was used to measure the predictive capability of
the model dependent constructs. This test is calculated using the blindfolding
technique. The Q 2
parameter must be greater than 0 (zero) so that the construct has predictive
validity ( Chin, 1998 ), given that the values above zero show
that the predictability of the model is relevant ( Sellin, 1995). As can be observed in Table
7, all
the Q 2
values are above zero, which supports the predictive relevance of the model in
relation to the latent endogenous variables.
Lastly, the Standardized Residual of the
Root Mean Square (SRMS) was calculated, this being the average difference between
the predicted and observed correlations (variances and covariances)
based on the residual standard deviation. Therefore, it can be considered a
goodness of fit measurement (model) for PLS-SEM ( Henseler et al., 2014 ). Given that the SRMS is an absolute
measurement, a value of zero indicates a perfect fit, but values below 0.08 are
generally considered a good fit ( Hu
& Bentler, 1999 ). In this sense, the SRMS value obtained
from the model of this investigation is of 0.062, which indicates an adequate
level of adjustment.
After carrying out the inferential
statistical analysis, it was observed that eight of the nine hypotheses were
accepted with an explained variance of 46.5%, which corroborates the predictive
level of the model; Fig. 2 shows the results obtained in a graph.
Hypothesis
contrast
The results show that
the quality of the information has positive and statistically significant
values for the User Satisfaction and Use–Utility variables (H 1 = 0.299 and H2 = 0.276).
Therefore, they are accepted and consequently this suggests that the SMEs with
Information Systems that provide timely, up to date, useful, relevant, and
exact information with a good level of detail and easy to interpret, obtain a
better user performance. That is, it is considered that the use of quality data
is a secure source for user satisfaction in terms of having information in
accordance with their needs, and allows them to make better and faster
decisions. These results are similar to those obtained by Floropoulos, Spathis,
Halvatzis, and Tsipouridou
(2010) , Nunes (2012) and Solano et al. (2014) , and partially
analogous to those obtained by Roldán and Leal (2003), Calderón and Rodríguez (2010) and Pérez (2010) , due to these find significant
relation only with regard to user satisfaction.
Regarding
system quality (hypotheses H 3 and H4 ), positive and significant
coefficients can be observed with the user satisfaction and use–utility
constructs (H 3 = 0.291, H4 = 0.253). Therefore, the hypotheses are accepted,
derived from the users perceiving that the Information System is easy to use,
user-friendly, does not fail, is quick and compatible with other systems utilized
in the institution, which allows them to reduce costs, understand the needs of
the clients, have a better selection of suppliers, and improve the internal
efficiency, among others. The results obtained are similar to those found by Pérez (2010), Nunes (2012), Tona et al. (2012) and Wang (2008) , in the sense that in all of them a strong
relationship is detected between the construct and its latent variables.
Regarding
the quality of the IT services in relation to the use–utility of the system,
hypothesis H 5 does not have
statistical support, therefore, it is not accepted. In the analyzed SMEs, this
relation is found due to either outsourcing of the service or the lack of
training in the manner of providing the service. On the other hand, regarding
user satisfaction, the results show a positive and statistically significant
value (H 5 β = 0.310; p
> 0.001). These results are partially similar
to those obtained by Wang (2008), Pérez (2010) and Nunes (2012) , since the authors
find that it significantly influences its latent variables. However, in this
investigation it is only reflected in user satisfaction. Even then, the study
provides empirical support to the construct in question by determining that it
does influence the perception of success of an information system.
As for
user satisfaction, it is worth emphasizing that hypothesis H 8 (β = 0.289; p > 0.001)
was accepted, which demonstrates that this construct exercises significant
influence on the use–utility of the system, meaning the users feel satisfied
with the qualities of the system and, therefore, are motivated to use it. The
results are in line with those of McGill
and Hobbs (2003) and Kettinger, Park, and Smith (2009) .
Finally,
the use–utility and user satisfaction hypotheses were accepted, given that they
showed positive and statistically significant coefficients with the
organizational results (H 9 = 0.326, H7 = 0.411), which demonstrates that these variables
have a significant effect on the organizational impact. The aforementioned is
relevant for the success of an IS, given that it indicates that the respondents
perceive increases in the productivity, internal efficiency, or a decrease in
the operational costs, meaning they distinguish the IS as a means of improving
business performance, being consistent with what was reported by Gable, Sedera, and Chan
(2003) , DeLone and McLean (2003), Medina (2005), Abrego, Sánchez, and Medina (2014) , and Solano et al. (2014) . Finally, it is
perceived that user satisfaction contributes the most with a β of 4.11. This could
suggest that the SMEs that are concerned with providing their system users with
quality characteristics will have as a result a greater individual performance
(user satisfaction, use–utility of the system), which will lead to an
improvement of the organizational results.
Conclusions, administrative implications, and limitations
In this document, aspects relevant to the
success of the IS and their impact in the management of companies were
investigated, in accordance with the research trends in the IS area ( Petter et al., 2008, 2013 ) and based on the model proposed by DeLone and McLean (2003) . This was done with the purpose of
having other perspectives regarding their impacts outside of developed
countries and thus to contribute to the development of studies on the impact of
IS on Mexican SMEs, all the while considering that the studied economic units
contribute in a relevant manner to the development of the research environment.
Several conclusions are obtained based on
the findings. First, the results of the empirical analysis indicate that
information quality is the most important precedent for user satisfaction and
for the utility of the IS, given that the users consider the availability and
accuracy of the information to be a key element for the successful implementation
of a system, followed by the quality of the system, and the service.
Nevertheless, by considering the three elements of quality (information, system
and service) as a whole, the influence of said elements on satisfaction and
utility of the users can be considered from substantial to moderate, which
allows inferring that more support on behalf of the organizational direction
for the dimensions of quality of the IS could contribute to a better individual
performance (use–utility, user satisfaction).
This generates implications for the system
designers, who have to address the needs of the end users and make full use of
the completeness, security, availability, speed, and accuracy of the
information to increase user satisfaction, but specially to improve the
intention of use–utility of the system.
Similarly, we conclude that the users that
achieved greater satisfaction are motivated toward a greater use of the IS,
where a greater satisfaction and use lead to better results at the
organizational level. This could support companies in their decisions to invest
in technology, given that it would allow to increase the quality of services,
contributing to the organizational performance. In other words, the
organizations with greater technological infrastructure, development
methodologies, and competence of their programmers, improve the results of the
quality of the system, contributing to the individual and organizational
development of the company ( Solano
et al., 2014 ). Thirdly,
the proposed model and its elements demonstrated that they can be used as a
beneficial tool by the organizations to assess the implementation of the IS,
given that the results implied an adequate predictive power for the utilized
variables. Thus, highlighting the importance that the organizations must place
in the assessment of the IS in order to guarantee a true internal benefit.
The results obtained could be useful for
the administrators and IT managers in terms of structuring of policies, allowing
them a better integration of these types of technologies with regard to the
business strategies, all to allocate the scarce resources more efficiently.
Likewise, they can be of use in higher level educational institutions, given
that the results could be used as a base to design and update study programs,
as well as to promote further investigations that contribute to strengthening
the literature regarding the success of the IS in the organizations, derived
from the limitations found to determine it at an organizational level. Finally,
this work contributes to the literature on the measurement of the success of
the IS in the context of a country with an emerging economy, and in particular
in allowing to fully identify the measurement of its effectiveness and
incidence in the performance variables.
On the other hand, this investigation has
its limitations. First, the validity of a model cannot be truly established
based on a single study, given that the data represent a moment in time.
Secondly, the study was performed in a determined geographical context (state
of Tamaulipas, Mexico). Therefore, care should be taken when generalizing the
results, and the criticisms to the cause–effect relations between the
constructs in the model should be done with caution.
Therefore, we invite researches and
practitioners to make future works that take into consideration a more
diversified universe of companies, as well as to contemplate other geographical
regions different from the one studied in this work. Furthermore, future
studies should consider investigating the causes of success of the IS or, where
applicable, how they influence on the perception of the same, given that
currently there are gaps in the knowledge of these factors.
Acknowledgements
Our most
sincere appreciation for the logistical and financial support to the
investigation goes to PIFI P/PROSOCIE-2014-28MSU0010B-15 and Fondos UAT.
References
Abrego, D., Sánchez, Y., & Medina, J. (2014). Evaluación
de la calidad de los sistemas de información en los resultados y capacidades
organizacionales de empresas del noreste de México. In XIX Congreso
Internacional de Investigación en Contaduría, Administración e
Informática
Andreu, R., Ricart, J., & Valor, J. (1996). Estrategia y
sistemas de información (2a ed.). Madrid: Mc Graw-Hill.
Bakos, Y., & Treacy, M. (1986). Information technology and corporate
strategy: A research perspective. MIS Quarterly, 10, 107–119.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/249029
Ballantine, J., Bonner, M., Levy, M., Martin, A.,
Munro, I., & Powell, P. (1996). The 3-D model of information systems
success: The search for the dependent variable continues. Information
Resources Management Journal, 9(4), 5–14.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/irmj.1996100101
Ballou, P., & Tayi, K.
(1999). Enhancing data quality in data warehouse environments. Communications
of the ACM, 42(1), 73–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/291469.291471
Baroudi, J., Olson, M., &
Ives, B. (1986). An empirical study of the impact of user involvement on system
usage and information satisfaction. Communications of the ACM, 29(3),
232–238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/5666.5669
Bharati, P., & Berg, D.
(2005). Service quality from the other side: Information systems management at
Duquesne light. International Journal of Information Management, 25,
367–380. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2005.04.008
Bharati, P., & Chaudhury, A. (2006). Product customization on the web: An
empirical study of factors impacting choice board user satisfaction. In Management
Science and Information Systems Faculty Publication Series. Paper 14.
Available in: http://scholarworks.umb.edu/msis faculty pubs/14 Accessed
15.08.14
Bokhari, R. (2005). The
relationship between system usage and user satisfaction: A meta-analysis. The
Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 18, 211–234.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17410390510579927
Bradley, R., Pridmore, J.,
& Byrd, T. (2006). Information systems success in the context of different
corporate cultural types: An empirical investigation. Journal of Management
Information Systems, 23, 267–294.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-12222302011
Caldeira, M., & Ward, J.
(2002). Understanding the successful adoption and use of IS/IT in SMEs: An
explanation from Portuguese manufacturing industries. Information Systems
Journal, 12(2), 121–152.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2575.2002.00119.x
Calderón, J., & Rodríguez, C. (2010). Efecto de las estrategias competitivas y los recursos y
capacidades orientados al mercado sobre el crecimiento de las organizaciones. Contaduría y Administración, 57(1), 79–102.
Carmines, G., & Zeller, R. (1979). Reliability and
validity assessment. In Sage university paper series on quantitative
applications in the social sciences. Beverly Hills: Sage., series nos.
07-017.
Carr, C. (2002). A psychometric
evaluation of the expectations, perceptions, and difference-scores generated by
the IS-adapted SERVQUAL instrument. Decision
Sciences, 33, 281–296.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2002.tb01645.x
Casaló, L., Flavián, C., & Guinalíu, M.
(2011). Redes sociales virtuales desarrolladas por organizaciones
empresariales: Antecedentes de la intención de participación del consumidor. Cuadernos
de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa, 15, 42–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cede.2011.06.003
Chen, L., Soliman, K., Mao,
E., & Frolick, M. (2000). Measuring user
satisfaction with data warehosues: An exploratory
study. Information and Management, 37(3), 103–110.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(99)00042-7
Chin, W. (1998). Issues and opinion on structural
equation modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22(1), 7–17.
Chin, W. (2000). Partial Least Square for
researchers: An overview and presentation of recent advances using the PLS
approach. Available in: http://disc-nt.cba.uh.edu/chin/icis2000plstalk.pdf
Accessed 22.07.14
Choe, J. (1996). The relationships
among performance of accounting information systems, influence factors, and
evolution level of information systems. Journal of Management Information
Systems, 12(4), 215–239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1996.11518107
Croteau, A., & Bergeron, F.
(2001). An information technology trilogy: Business strategy, technological
deployment and organizational performance. Journal of Strategic Information
Systems, 10(2), 77–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.
1016/S0963-8687(01)00044-0
Davis, G., & Olson, M. (1985). Management
information systems: Conceptual foundations, structure, and development.
New York: McGraw-Hill.
DeLone, W., & McLean, E.
(1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information
Systems Research, 3(1), 61–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.3.1.60
DeLone, W., & McLean, E.
(2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information
systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems,
14(9), 9–30.
Derksen, B., & Luftman, J. (2013). Management and technology trends for IT
executives. Compact International Magazine, 6–15. Available in:
http://www.jstor.org/stable/40398184 Accessed 17.04.14
Díaz, M., & Sligo,
J. (1997). How software process improvement helped Motorola. IEEE Software,
14(5), 75–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/52.605934
Falk, R., & Miller, N. (1992). A primer for
soft modeling. Akron: The University of Akron Press.
Ferreira, R., & Cherobim,
A. (2012). Impacts of investments in it on the organizational performance of
baking companies of minas Gerais state: A multicase study. Revista
de Administracão e Contabilidade
da Unisinos, 9(2),
147–161. http://dx.doi.org/10.4013/base.2012.92.04
Fitzgerald, G., & Russo, N. (2005). The turnaround
of the London ambulance service computer-aided dispatch system (LAS-CAD). European
Journal of Information Systems, 14(3), 244–257.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000541
Floropoulos, J., Spathis, C., Halvatzis, D., &
Tsipouridou, M. (2010). Measuring the success of the
Greek taxation information system. International Journal of Information
Management, 30, 47–56.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2009.03.013
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models
with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing
Research, 18, 39–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3151312
Gable, G., Sedera, D., & Chan, T. (2003).
Enterprise systems success: A measurement model. In S. T. March, A. Massey,
& J. I. DeGross (Eds.), Twenty-fourth
international conference on information systems (pp. 576–591). Seattle,
USA: Association for Information Systems.
Gable, G., Sedera, D., &
Chan, T. (2008). Re-conceptualizing information system success: The IS-impact
measurement model. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9(7),
377–408.
Gómez, A., & Suárez, R. (2012). Sistemas de información herramientas prácticas para la
gestión empresarial (4a ed.). Madrid, Spain: Alfaomega.
Gonzáles, R.
(2012). Impacto de la Data Warehouse e
Inteligencia de Negocios en el Desempe˜no de las
Empresas: Investigación Empírica en Perú, Como País en Vías de Desarrollo.
Barcelona: Universitat Ramon
Llull. ESAN – Política de Empresa, Dirección
Recursos Humanos y Sistemas de Información. Tesis inédita.
Gorla, N., Somers, T., & Wong, B. (2010).
Organizational impact of system quality, information quality, and service
quality. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 19, 207–228.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2010.05.001
Haag, S., & Cummings, M. (2013). Management
information systems for the information age (9th ed.). USA: McGrawHill Education.
Haberkamp, A., Mac¸ada, A., Raimundini, S.,
& Bianchi, M. (2010). Impacto dos investimentos em
tecnologia da informacãonas
variáveis estratégicas das empresas prestadoras de servicos contábeis. Revista de
Administracão e Contabilidadeda
Unisinos, 7(2), 149–161.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4013/base.2010.72.06
Hair, J., Hult, G., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M.
(2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling
(PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Halawi, L., McCarthy, R.,
& Aronson, J. (2007). An empirical investigation of knowledge management
systems success. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 48(2),
121–135.
Henseler, J., Dijkstra, T., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.,
Diamantopoulos, A., Straub, D., et al. (2014). Common beliefs and reality about
partial least squares: Comments on Rönkkö & Evermann (2013). Organizational Research Methods, 17(2),
182–209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1094428114526928
Heo, J., & Han, I. (2003).
Performance measure of information systems (IS) in evolving computing
environments: An empirical investigation. Information & Management, 40(4),
243–256. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(02)00007-1
Hu, L., & Bentler, P.
(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis:
Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling,
6, 1–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Hwang, M., Windsor, J., & Pryor, A. (2000).
Building a knowledge base for MIS research: A meta-analysis of a systems
success model. Information Resources Management Journal, 13(2),
26–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/irmj.2000040103
Igbaria, M., & Tan, M.
(1997). The consequences of information technology acceptance on subsequent
individual performance. Information & Management, 32(3),
113–121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(97)00006-2
Johnson, M., Herrmann, A., & Huber, F. (2006). The
evolution of loyalty intentions. Journal of Marketing, 70(2),
122–132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.70.2.122
Kettinger, J., & Lee, C.
(1994). Perceived service quality and user satisfaction with information
services function. Decision Sciences, 25(5), 737–766.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1994.tb00829.x
Kettinger, W., Park, S. H., &
Smith, J. (2009). Understanding the consequences of information systems service
quality on IS service reuse. Information & Management, 46,
335–341. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2009.03.004
Kim, M., Moon, Y., & Kim, W. (2012). How
user-created-content (UCC) service quality influences user satisfaction and behaviour. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences,
29, 255–267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1218
Law, C., & Ngai, E. (2007). ERP systems adoption:
An exploratory study of the organizational factors and impacts of ERP success. Information
& Management, 44(4), 418–432.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2007.03.004
Lee, R. (2012). Does the success of information
systems really matters to firm performance? iBusiness, 4, 98–107.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ib.2012.42012
Livari, J. (2005). An
empirical test of the DeLone-McLean model of
information system success. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information
Systems, 36(2), 8–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1066149.1066152
Lunardi, G., Dolci, P., & Mac¸ada, A.
(2010). Adocão de tecnologia
de informacão e seu impacto
no desempenho organizacional: Um
estudo realizado com. Revista de Administracão — RAUSP, 45(1), 5–17.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0080-21072010000100001
Mahmood, M.,
& Soon, S. (1991). A comprehensive model for measuring the potential impact of information
technology on organizational strategic variables. Decision Sciences, 22,
869–897. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1991.tb00368.x
McGill, T., & Hobbs, V. (2003). User-developed
applications and information systems success: A test of DeLoneand
McLean’s model. Information Resources Management Journal, 16(1),
24–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/irmj.2003010103
McGill, T., Hobbs, V., & Klobas,
J. (2000). Testing the DeLone and McLean Model of IS
success in the user developed application domain. In 11th Australasian Conference on Information Systems.
Medina, J.
(2005). Evaluación del impacto de los sistemas de información en el desempe˜no individual del usuario: Aplicación en
instituciones universitarias. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Tesis
inédita.
Medina, J.,
& Chaparro, J. (2007). The impact of the human element in the information
system quality for decision making and user satisfaction. Journal of
Computer Information Systems, 48(2), 44–52.
Medina, J., Lavín, J., & Pedraza, N. (2011). Seguridad en la administración y calidad de los datos de un
sistema de información contable en el desempe˜no
organizacional. Contaduría y Administración, 57(4), 11–34.
Nelson, R., Todd, P., & Wixom, B. (2005).
Antecedents of information and system quality: An empirical examination within
the context of data warehousing. Journal of
Management Information Systems, 21, 199–235.
Nunes, G. (2012). Estudio
de satisfacción del usuario de sistemas de información en hospitales
universitarios del nordeste(Brasil). Espa˜na: DEHESA, Universidad de
Extremadura. Tesis inédita.
Pérez, B. (2010). Validity of DeLone
and McLean’s model of information systems success at the web site level of
analysis. EUA: Louisiana
State University. Tesis
inédita.
Pérez, J.,
& Machado, A. (2015). Relationship between management information systems
and corporate performances. Revista de Contabilidad — Spanish Accounting Review, 18(1),
32–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsar.2014.02.001
Pesado, P., Bertone, R., Esponda, S., Pasini, A., Boracchia, M., Martorelli, S., et al. (2013). Mejora de procesos en eldesarrollo de sistemas de software y en procesos de
gestión. Experiencias en PyMEs. In XV Workshop de
Investigadores en Ciencias de la Computación (pp. 581–585).
Petter, S., DeLone, W., & McLean, E. (2008). Measuring information
systems success: Models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships. European
Journal of Information Systems, 17, 236–263.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2008.15
Petter, S., DeLone, W., & McLean, E. (2013). Information systems
success: The quest for the independent variables. Journal of Management
Information Systems, 29(4), 7–62.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222290401
Pitt, L., Watson, R., & Kavan,
C. (1995). Service quality: A measure of information systems effectiveness. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 173–192. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/249687
Qutaishat, F., Khattab, S., Zaid, M., & Al-Manasra, E. (2012). The effect of ERP successful
implementation on employee’s productivity, service quality and innovation: An
empirical study in telecommunication sector in Jordan. International Journal
of Business and Management, 7(19), 45–54.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v7n19p45
Rai, A., Lang, S., & Walker, R. (2002). Assessing
the validity of IS success models: An empirical test and theoreticalanalysis.
Information Systems Research, 13(1), 50–69.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.1.50.96
Rai, A., Patnayakuni, R.,
& Seth, N. (2006). Firm performance impacts of digitally enabled supply
chain integration capabilities. MIS Quarterly, 30(2), 225–246.
Ravichandran, T., & Lertwongsatien, C. (2005). Effect of information systems
resources and capabilities on firm performance: A resource based perspective. Journal
of Management Information Systems, 21, 237–276.
Ringle, C., Wende, S., & Becker, J. (2014). Smartpls
3. Hamburg: SmartPLS. Available in:
http://www.smartpls.com Accessed 22.10.14
Roldán, J.
(2000). Sistemas de información ejecutivos EIS. Génesis, implantación y
repercusiones organizativas. Universidad de Sevilla. Tesis doctoral
inédita.
Roldán, J.,
& Leal, A. (2003). A validation test of an adaptation of the DeLone
and McLean’s model in the Spanish EIS field. In J. Cano (Ed.), Critical reflections
on information systems: A systemic approach (pp. 66–84). Hershey, PA: Idea
Group Publishing.
Sabherwal, R., Jeyaraj, A., & Chowa, C. (2006).
Information system success: Individual and organizational determinants. Management
Science, 52(12), 1849–1864. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0583
Sánchez, M., & Roldán,
J. (2005). Web acceptance and usage model. A comparison between goal-directed
and experientialweb users. Internet Research, 15(1),
21–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/10662240510577059
Seddon, P. (1997). A respecification
and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS
success. Information System Research, 8(3), 240–253.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.8.3.240
Seddon, P., & Kiew, M.
(1994). A partial test and development of the DeLone
and McLean model of IS success. Proceedings of the International Conference
on Information Systems, 99–110.
Sedera, D., & Gable, G.
(2004). A factor and structural equation analysis of the enterprise systems
success measurement model. In Twenty-Fifth International Conferences on
Information Systems. Available in:
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.86.1714&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Accessed 05.06.14
Sellin, N. (1995). Partial
least square modeling in research on educational achievement. In H. Wilifred Bos, Rainer, & y
Lehmann (Eds.), Reflections on educational achievement (pp. 256–267).
New York, USA: Waxmann Munster.
Sethi, V., & King, W.
(1994). Development of measures to assess the extent to which an information
technology application provides competitive advantage. Management Science,
40, 1601–1627. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.40.12.1601
Shin, B. (2003). An exploratory investigation of
system success factors in data warehousing. Journal of the Association of
Information Systems, 4, 141–168.
Solano, O., García, D.,
& Bernal, J. (2014). Influence of the implementation of information systems
on performance in small and mid-sized enterprises: An empirical study in
Colombia. Cuadernos de Administración,
30(52), 31–43.
Straub, D. (1989). Validating instruments in MIS
research. MIS Quarterly, 13, 147–190.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/248922
Tallon, P., Kraemer, L., &
Gurbaxani, V. (2000). Executives’ perceptions of the
business value of information technology: A process-oriented approach. Journal
of Management Information Systems, 16, 145–173.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2000.11518269
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995). Understanding
information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information
Systems Research, 6(2), 144–176.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.6.2.144
Tona, O., Carlsson, S., & Eom, S.
(2012). An
empirical test of DeLone and McLean’s information
system success model in a public organization. AMCIS 2012 Proceedings,. Paper 10. Available in:
http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2012/proceedings/StrategicUseIT/10 Accessed
10.11.14
Torkzadeh, G., & Dwyer, D.
(1994). A path analytic study of determinants of information system usage. Omega,
22(4), 339–348. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(94)90060-4
Turban, E., Volonino, L.,
& Wood, R. (2013). Information technology for management: Advancing
sustainable, profitable business growth (9th ed.). USA: John Wiley &
Sons.
Urbach, N., Smolnik, S., & Riempp, G.
(2009). The state of research on information systems success. Business &
Information Systems Engineering, 1(4), 315–325.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12599-009-0059-y
Vázquez, S. (2015). Medición
de la Calidad del Servicio para Agentes de Suscripción en Revistas Digitales a
través del Modelo Servqual. GECONTEC Revista
Internacional de Gestión del Conocimiento y la Tecnología, 3(1),
53–68.
Wang, Y. (2008). Assessing e-commerce systems success:
A respecification and validation of the DeLone and McLeanmodel of IS
success. Information Systems Journal, 18, 529–557.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2007.00268.x
Wixom, B., & Todd, P. (2005). A theoretical
integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Information
Systems Research, 16(1), 85–102.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.1050.0042
Wixom, B., & Watson, H. (2001). An empirical
investigation of the factors affecting data warehousing success. MIS
Quarterly, 25(1), 17–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3250957
Wu, J., & Wang, Y. (2006). Measuring KMS success:
A respecification of the DeLone
and McLean’s model. Information and Management, 43, 728–739.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.05.002
Ynzunza, C., & Izar, J. (2011). Efecto de
las estrategias competitivas y los recursos y capacidades orientados al mercado
sobre el crecimiento de las organizaciones. Contaduría y Administración,
58(1), 169–197. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0186-1042(13)71202-6
Peer Review under
the responsibility of
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
Métricas de artículo
Metrics powered by PLOS ALM
Enlaces refback
- No hay ningún enlace refback.
![Licencia de Creative Commons](https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
Este obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional.
CONTADURÍA Y ADMINISTRACIÓN, año 70, 2025, es una publicación trimestral editada por la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Colonia Ciudad Universitaria, Delegación Coyoacán, C.P. 04510, México, Ciudad de México, a través de la División de Investigación de la Facultad de Contaduría y Administración - UNAM, Circuito Exterior, s/n, Colonia Ciudad Universitaria, Delegación Coyoacán, C.P. 04510, México, Ciudad de México., Tels. (55) 56 22 84 57, (55) 56 22 84 58 Ext. 144 y (55) 56 22 84 94, http://www.cya.unam.mx, correo electrónico: revista_cya@fca.unam.mx, Editor responsable: José Alberto García Narváez, Reserva de Derechos al Uso Exclusivo No. 04-2016-071316434900-203, otorgada por el Instituto Nacional del Derecho de Autor, ISSN 2448-8410, Responsable de la última actualización de este Número, División de Investigación de la Facultad de Contaduría y Administración-UNAM, José Alberto García Narváez, Circuito Exterior, s/n, Colonia Ciudad Universitaria, Delegación Coyoacán, C.P. 04510, México, Cd., Mx., fecha de última modificación, 29 de enero de 2025.
Las opiniones expresadas por los autores no necesariamente reflejan la postura del editor de la publicación. Se autoriza la reproducción total o parcial de los textos aquí publicados siempre y cuando se cite la fuente completa y la dirección electrónica de la publicación.
Contaduría y Administración by División de Investigación de la Facultad de Contaduría y Administración is licensed under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento- 4.0 Internacional.
Creado a partir de la obra en http://www.cya.unam.mx.
Correo electrónico: revista_cya@fca.unam.mx
ISSN: 0186-1042 (Print) 2448-8410 (Online)